Reed, and three cousins. As the relationship between Jane and the Reeds deteriorates, Mrs. Reed decides to send Jane away to Lowood school. Before Jane leaves, Mrs.
How much more modest is the libertine who obeys the call of appetite or fancy than the lewd joker who sets the table in a roar!
I did allow myself to be intimidated in to putting off reading this book which has been languishing on the shelf since last year despite reading her impressively passionate Letters Written During a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark in part by the terrifying title - vindication, rights, woman.
All suggestive of great earnestness and grappling with fundamental issues, small wonder, I plead, that I allowed myself to be distracted by more lascivious and light hearted reading.
Though plainly Mary W. Obviously I am disabled in various ways in reviewing Wollstonecraft, on account of sex and age view spoiler [ one needs ideally to be a child of the s or s to be at one with its flow hide spoiler ] and expectation. The last maybe is the most difficult for the idea of "Feminism" will hang over the reader, but she is Wollstoncraftian, and more besides, she is Mary view spoiler [ a woman with her own distinct experiences and obsessions view spoiler [ inescapably breast-feeding which leaks increasingly into the latter part of the text hide spoiler ] hide spoiler ], not the several hundred following years of thought, experience and expectation that come after her.
In that anti-continental feeling and her horror of Popery view spoiler [ I do wonder quite why anti-catholic feeling was so strong, did people seriously believe that given half a chance papists would be slitting the throats of all the protestants of a night?
Forging the Nation Her desire for woman to assert herself through virtue and through virtue and motherhood to assume or earn a familial and social centrality seems to prefigure The Angel in the House and a rather primly respectable Victorianism.
At its root it is quite a powerful vision of human nature and society. More darkly I felt her picture of emancipated woman not as a person at ease but ideally forever on guard and dedicated to serious thinking who forcefully rejects with outrage all fripperies as abominations devoting herself to her breast-fed children was also modern - the great pillar of shoulds and social requirements towering over the small naked figure of the actual individual trying to live their lives as best they can.
Actually as a man reading a book like this one is enormously reassured because in her account its all about the men. If in her sensible and reasonable views on the monarchy, British system of government, and tax policy, she remains sadly considerably ahead of our times, in other ways radicalism withheld is an important theme of her work.
Liberation is for the middle class woman, and her liberation requires the continued drudgery of lower class woman view spoiler [ still I suppose a live issue hide spoiler ].
Still one of the many problems in opening your trap and allowing words to tumble out, or in putting pen to paper is that others can see potentials and possibilities that you yourself view spoiler [ not meaning you of course honoured Goodreader hide spoiler ] are blind to.
And in her message of emancipation of woman as good for man we can see the potential that the liberation of the lower classes must logically be equally good for all society, the same arguments for the release of talent and the strengthening of the individual must hold.
Softer skills of persuasion and cunning or more vaguely of charisma view spoiler [ often indicated by being the abandoned child of an unmarried teen-aged mother hide spoiler ] are more typical of our leaders than muscles.
In terms of the argument, the Rights of Man, and the ink fought wars fought in the British press over the rights and woeful wrongs of the French Revolution are unspoken in the background.
Indeed this book is one soldier in that battle. Nor is Wollenstonecraft ever explicit about what the Rights of Woman are, though she is explicit that this is about Middle-class women, not all women. Her view is slightly curious in that early on she sees the inferior status of woman as a social phenomena, perpetuated through social structures, nor does she see any potential conflict between child rearing and middle-class women having professional careers - but then she assumes a dependant servant class.Analyse English Tutorials Specialising in Primary, High School and English Speaking programs.
Focus on analytical writing, expressing creativity through writing, exploration of the literary mind and exposing the appreciative art of English.
Jane Eyre By Charlotte Bronte Words | 5 Pages.
The nineteenth-century novel Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte is considered to be a gothic novel. Gothic literature took place mostly in England from to , falling into the category of Romantic literature.
Jul 01, · Charlotte Brontë’s enduring classic—the story of a young woman’s quest for love and acceptance in Victorian England The young orphan Jane Eyre inhabits a fragile position.
Born to a good family but with no wealth of her own, Jane is sent to live with her uncle’s family—an arrangement that turns sour when he dies—and then to Lowood, a punitive and tyrannically run boarding school for girls/5(58).
Charlotte Brontë in Jane Eyre, published in , willed and were often paired with heroes who evolved into caring and compassionate men who truly admired the women they loved.
This was in contrast to the contemporary romances published during this time. I learned only recently that Charlotte Bronte is a masterful writer.
She crafted the story of Jane Eyre, a tale following young, abused Jane, through her experiences in school, then as a governess. Class as an important issue during the time of the writing of 'Jane Eyre,' and in spite of the Bronte's almost isolated lives on the Yorkshire Moors, they too would have been acutely aware of the pressures and expectations of a society divided, cut up into a caste system needing to be conformed to.