Comparison of a health care system

Much of the appeal of the Canadian system is that it seems to do more for less.

Comparison of a health care system

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to compare health care systems in three highly advanced industrialized countries: The first part of the research paper will focus on the description of health care systems in the above-mentioned countries while the second part will analyze, evaluate and compare the three systems regarding equity and efficiency.

Finally, an overview of recent changes and proposed future reforms in these countries will be provided as well. We start by providing a general description and comparison of the structure of health care systems in Canada, Germany and the United States.

Health insurance coverage is universal. General taxes finance NHI through a single payer system only one third-party payer is responsible for paying health care providers for medical services. Consumer co-payments are negligible and physician choice is unlimited.

Production of health care services is private; physicians receive payments on a negotiated fee for service and hospitals receive global budget payments Method used by third party payers to control medical care costs by establishing total expenditure limits for medical services over a specified period of time.

Most of the population lives within miles of the United States border. From the American point of view, Canada provides a good comparison and contrast in terms of the structure of its health care systems.

In Germany’s healthcare system, which goes back to Otto von Bismarck’s social security programme of the s, anyone residing in the country is required to take out a health insurance scheme. Feb 12,  · Each health care system analyzed above is experiencing a continuous process of changes and improvements and all three systems fight the never-ending battle of cost containment, provision of quality services and maintaining and expanding access to health care. Gauging the quality of health care systems is often difficult and restricted by the availability of data. One method for measuring quality is to look at mortality rates. Mortality rates can be influenced by a myriad of factors, one of which is the quality of the health care system for diseases where mortality is .

The Canadian health care system began to take on its current form when the province of Saskatchewan set up a hospitalization plan immediately after WWII. The rural, low—income province was plagued by shortages of both hospital beds and medical practitioners.

The main feature of this plan was the creation of the regional system of hospitals: Inthe federal parliament enacted the Hospital and Diagnostic Services Act laying the groundwork for a nationwide system of hospital insurance.

By all ten provinces and the two territories had hospital insurance plans of their own with the federal government paying one half of the costs. Since the health care system has moved in different directions.

While Canada has had publicly funded national health insurance, the United States has relied largely on private financing and delivery. During this period, spending in the United States has grown much more rapidly despite large groups that either uninsured or minimally insured.

Comparison of a health care system

The provisions of the Canada Health Act define the health care delivery system as it currently operates. Under the Act, each provincial health plan is administered at the provincial level and provides comprehensive first dollar coverage of all medically necessary services.


With minor exceptions, health coverage is available to all residents with no out of pocket charges. Most physicians are paid on a fee for service basis and enjoy a great deal of practice autonomy. Private health insurance for covered services is illegal.

Most Canadians have supplemental private insurance for uncovered services, such as prescription drugs and dental services. As a result, virtually all physicians are forced to participate and each health plan effectively serves all residents in the province Henderson Patients do not participate in the reimbursement process, and reimbursement exclusively takes place between the public insurer the government and the health care provider.

The monetary exchange is practically non-existent between patient and health care provider. The ministry of health in each province is responsible for controlling medical costs. Cost control is attempted primarily through fixed global budgets and predetermined fees for physicians.

Specifically, the operating budgets of hospitals are approved and funded entirely by the ministry in each province and an annual global budget is negotiated between the ministry and each individual hospital. Capital expenditures must also be approved by the ministry, which funds the bulk of the spending.

Physician fees are determined by periodic negotiations between the ministry and provincial medical associations the Canadian version of the American Medical Association.

Health Policy: Private Healthcare in the US

With the passage of the Canada Health Act ofthe right to extra billing was removed in all provinces. Extra billing or balance billing refers to a situation in which the physician bills the patient some dollar amount above the predominated fee set by third party payer.

For the profession as a whole, negotiated fee increases are implemented in steps, conditional on the rate of increase in the volume of services.The system is decentralised across the country’s 17 autonomous regions and so the quality of care, and in particular access to specialist procedures or units, varies.

This leads to a degree of. Although Japan's health care system has flaws, it has We cannot perfectly compare national healthcare systems, nor can we wholly adopt another's.

Japan's system, for example, is bolstered by. Comparison of Healthcare Systems: US and UK. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: In addition, regulators should also intervene to eliminate these market failures, where possible, in the US health care system in an attempt to maximise the provision of health care to individuals.

India has a decentralized public health care system, run largely by its 28 states and seven territories. The central government’s only constitutional mandate is to oversee medical education and collect infectious diseases statistics, Rao said.

Who provides healthcare and how is it paid for? How healthcare is funded has a direct effect on the level of healthcare people have access to.

Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States is often made by government, public health and public policy analysts.

Comparison of a health care system

The two countries had similar healthcare systems before Canada changed its system in the s and s. The United States spends much more money on healthcare than Canada, on both a per-capita basis and as a percentage of GDP.

Comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States - Wikipedia